This flowchart illustrates a comprehensive verification path for deploying Large Language Models (LLMs), covering smoke tests, performance benchmarks, and
%%{init: {"theme": "base", "themeVariables": {"background": "#ffffff", "primaryColor": "#f5f3ff", "primaryBorderColor": "#8b5cf6", "primaryTextColor": "#0f172a", "lineColor": "#64748b"}}}%%
flowchart TB
V1["vLLM service"] --> V2["smoke tests<br>health · simple chat · IE · multi-turn · response_format"]
V2 --> V3["benchmark<br>TTFT · tok/s · 并发吞吐 · 错误率"]
V3 --> V4["stability check<br>normal vs constrained json_object"]
V4 --> V5["部署结论<br>可用性 · 性能 · 稳定性"]
classDef dep fill:#f5f3ff,stroke:#8b5cf6,color:#0f172a;
classDef out fill:#f0fdf4,stroke:#22c55e,color:#0f172a;
class V1,V2,V3,V4 dep;
class V5 out;
The diagram outlines a sequential process for validating an LLM service deployment. It starts with basic smoke tests for health, chat, information extraction, multi-turn conversations, and response format. This is followed by performance benchmarking, measuring metrics like TTFT, tokens per second, concurrent throughput, and error rates. Finally, a stability check assesses structured output consistency, comparing normal versus constrained JSON object responses, leading to a final deployment conclusion on availability, performance, and stability.
Use this diagram when deploying a Large Language Model (LLM) into a production environment to ensure its availability, performance, and the integrity of its structured outputs. It's crucial for validating model behavior and stability before go-live.
This path can be adapted by adding more specific domain-related tests to the smoke test phase, integrating A/B testing or canary deployments, or incorporating security and compliance checks. The benchmark metrics can be customized based on application-specific SLAs, and the stability checks can be extended to cover other output formats or complex reasoning tasks.